Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0613620160360020280
Health Social Welfare Review
2016 Volume.36 No. 2 p.280 ~ p.310
A Grounded Theory of Non-take-up Group's Life Process
Lee Jeong-Gi

Kim Yun-Young
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to draw the social policy implications for improvement in the reality of non-take-up group by understanding the group¡¯s current situation and adaptation toward poverty. In order to achieve this objective, 12 people from the group who do not benefit from the National Basic Livelihood Security Act (NBLSA, enacted in 1999) were interviewed to gather data regarding why they do not benefit from NBLSA, their actual living conditions, their ways of adaptation toward poverty and emotional changes were collected, which were then analyzed by the grounded theory method. As a result of the analysis, a total of 14 categories were drawn: ¡®the individual situation of being tied up¡¯, ¡®obstacles that block benefit eligibility¡¯, ¡®impoverished social capital¡¯, ¡®psychological contraction¡¯, ¡®deteriorating economic strength¡¯, ¡®the reality of absolute poverty¡¯, ¡®exclusion from the right to life¡¯, ¡®the unfair world¡¯, ¡®breeze of the community¡¯, ¡®onerous family circumstances¡¯, ¡®self-directed orientation of life¡¯, ¡®desperate survival tactics¡¯, ¡®becoming lethargic¡¯, and ¡®the ambivalent feeling towards benefit eligibility¡¯. These categories were theorized according to the paradigm of experience process based on the central phenomenon of exclusion from public assistance and the consequent strategy in response to the phenomenon. The main category was ¡®desperate adaptation to inhumane conditions¡¯. The outcomes were arranged by how the diverse circumstances influence the individual, local, and national level and the counterplan for each level was discussed.
KEYWORD
Blind-spot, Poverty Problem, Grounded Theory, Absolute Poverty, Public Assistance, Health Benefit, Non-take-up
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)